Skip to main content

Tutorial 2 Workings

  1. Consider the space of continuous differentiable functions C1([a,b])C^1([a,b]) with the C1C^1-norm
∥f∥=sup⁡x∈[a,b]∣f(x)∣+sup⁡x∈[a,b]∣f′(x)∣\Vert f \Vert=\sup_{x \in [a,b]}|f(x)|+\sup_{x \in [a,b]}|f'(x)|

Prove that C1([a,b])C^1([a,b]) is a Banach space with respect to the given norm.

Let (fn)(f_n) be a Cauchy sequence in the space C1([a,b])C^1([a,b]), then for any ε>0\varepsilon>0, there exists a positive integer NN such that whenever n,m⩾Nn,m \geqslant N, we have that ∥fn−fm∥<ε\Vert f_n-f_m \Vert<\varepsilon.

Note that if we take any ε>0\varepsilon>0 to obtain the corresponding NN, and fix any x∈Xx \in X, we have that

∣fn(x)−fm(x)∣⩽sup⁡x∈[a,b]∣fn(x)−fm(x)∣⩽∥fn−fm∥<ε.|f_n(x)-f_m(x)| \leqslant \sup_{x \in [a,b]}|f_n(x)-f_m(x)| \leqslant \Vert f_n-f_m \Vert < \varepsilon.

Since the inequality above holds for all x∈[a,b]x \in [a,b], it follows that fnf_n converges uniformly to a function ff.

Using the same argument (replacing fnf_n and fmf_m by fn′f_n' and fm′f_m' respectively), we also see that the sequence (fn′)(f_n') obtained by taking the first derivative of every term of the sequence (fn)(f_n) converges uniformly to a function gg.

Due to the uniform convergence of (fn)(f_n) and (fn′)(f_n'), the limit ff is continuous and differentiable with f′=gf'=g.

We claim that (fn)(f_n) converges to ff. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 be arbitrary. Applying the uniform convergence of (fn)(f_n) and (fn′)(f_n'), choose N1,N2N_1,N_2 such that sup⁡x∈[a,b]∣f(x)−fn(x)∣<ε/2\sup_{x \in [a,b]}|f(x)-f_n(x)|<\varepsilon/2 whenever n⩾N1n \geqslant N_1 and sup⁡x∈[a,b]∣f′(x)−fn′(x)∣<ε/2\sup_{x \in [a,b]}|f'(x)-f_n'(x)|<\varepsilon/2 whenever n⩾N2n \geqslant N_2. It follows that when n⩾max⁡{N1,N2}n \geqslant \max\{N_1,N_2\}, we have that ∥f−fn∥=sup⁡x∈[a,b]∣f′(x)−fn′(x)∣+sup⁡x∈[a,b]∣f′(x)−fn′(x)∣<ε/2+ε/2=ε\Vert f-f_n \Vert = \sup_{x \in [a,b]}|f'(x)-f_n'(x)|+\sup_{x \in [a,b]}|f'(x)-f_n'(x)|<\varepsilon/2+\varepsilon/2=\varepsilon. Therefore, C1([a,b])C^1([a,b]) is a Banach space under the given norm.

  1. Let YY be a closed subspace of a normed linear space (X,∥⋅∥)(X, \Vert \cdot \Vert). Let X/YX/Y denote the quotient space (elements of X/YX/Y are additive cosets.) For x+Y∈X/Yx + Y \in X/Y define the quotient norm ∥⋅∥∗\Vert \cdot \Vert_* by
∥x+Y∥∗=inf⁡y∈Y∥x−y∥\Vert x + Y \Vert_* = \inf_{y \in Y}\Vert x-y \Vert

Show that ∥⋅∥∗\Vert \cdot \Vert_* is a norm on X/YX/Y. Also, if XX is a Banach space, show that X/YX/Y is a Banach space under the quotient norm.

Since ∥⋅∥\Vert \cdot \Vert is positive, the infimum of all possible values of ∥x−y∥\Vert x-y \Vert amongst all y∈Yy \in Y is also not smaller than zero, so ∥⋅∥∗\Vert \cdot \Vert_* is positive.

Note that ∥x+Y∥∗=inf⁡y∈Y∥x−y∥=0\Vert x+Y \Vert_* =\inf_{y \in Y}\Vert x-y \Vert=0 if and only if ∥x−y′∥=0\Vert x-y' \Vert=0 for some y′∈Yy' \in Y due to the positivity of ∥⋅∥\Vert \cdot \Vert. This happens if and only if x=y′x = y' due to the definiteness of ∥⋅∥\Vert \cdot \Vert, which means that x∈Yx \in Y, so x+Yx + Y is the zero vector in the quotient space, thereby showing that ∥⋅∥∗\Vert \cdot \Vert_* is definite.

Let ss be a scalar. We see that ∥sx+Y∥∗=inf⁡y∈Y∥sx−y∥=inf⁡y∈Y∥sx−sy∥=∣s∣inf⁡y∈Y∥x−y∥=∣s∣∥x+Y∥∗\Vert sx + Y \Vert_* = \inf_{y \in Y}\Vert sx-y \Vert=\inf_{y \in Y}\Vert sx-sy \Vert = |s|\inf_{y \in Y}\Vert x-y \Vert=|s|\Vert x+Y \Vert_*. Note that the second equality applies the fact that a vector subspace is closed under scalar multiplication, whereas the third equality applies the absolute homogeneity of ∥⋅∥\Vert \cdot \Vert. This proves the absolute homogeneity of ∥⋅∥∗\Vert \cdot \Vert_*.

As for the triangle inequality, we see that for x1,x2∈Xx_1,x_2 \in X, we have that ∥x1+x2+Y∥∗=inf⁡y∈Y∥x1+x2−y∥=inf⁡y∈Y∥x1−y+x2−y∥⩽inf⁡y∈Y∥x1−y∥+inf⁡y∈Y∥x2−y∥=∥x1+Y∥∗+∥x2+Y∥∗\Vert x_1+x_2+Y \Vert_*=\inf_{y \in Y} \Vert x_1+x_2-y \Vert=\inf_{y \in Y} \Vert x_1-y+x_2-y \Vert \leqslant \inf_{y \in Y}\Vert x_1-y \Vert + \inf_{y \in Y} \Vert x_2-y \Vert = \Vert x_1+Y \Vert_* + \Vert x_2+Y \Vert_*. Note that the second equality applies the fact that a vector subspace is closed under vector addition. This proves the triangle inequality for ∥⋅∥∗\Vert \cdot \Vert_* .

This concludes the proof that ∥⋅∥∗\Vert \cdot \Vert_* is a norm.

For an argument that shows that X/YX/Y is a Banach space under the quotient norm, see here.