Skip to main content

Extras

Topological Groups (Munkres Chapter 2, Supplementary Exercises Section)

The crossover between the studies of topology and abstract algebra gives rise to the concept of topological groups.

Definition. A topological group GG is a group that is also a topological space satisfying the T1T_1 axiom, such that the binary operation map :G×GG\cdot : G \times G \to G given by (x,y)xy(x,y) \mapsto x \cdot y and inverse map 1:GG^{-1} : G \to G given by xx1x \mapsto x^{-1} are continuous maps.

  1. Let HH denote a group that is also a topological space satisfying the T1T_1 axiom. Show that HH is a topological group if and only if the map of H×HH \times H into HH sending (x,y)(x,y) into xy1x \cdot y^{-1} is continuous.
  1. Show that the following are topological groups: (a) (Z,+)(\mathbb{Z},+)

(b) (R,+)(\mathbb{R},+)

(c) (R+,)(\mathbb{R}_+,\cdot)

(d) (S1,)(S^1,\cdot), where we take S1S^1 to be the space of all complex numbers zz for which z=1|z|=1.

(e) The general linear group GL(n)\mathrm{GL}(n), under the operation of matrix multiplication. (GL(n)\mathrm{GL}(n) is the set of all nonsingular n×nn \times n matrices, topologised by considering it as a subset of Euclidean space of dimension n2n^2 in the natural way.)

  1. Let HH be a subspace of GG. Show that if HH is also a subgroup of GG, then both HH and H\overline{H} are topological groups.
  1. The integer Z\mathbb{Z} are a normal subgroup of (R,+)(\mathbb{R},+). The quotient R/Z\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z} is a familiar topological group; what is it?

Galois Theory for Infinite Extensions

note

This section is based on a lecture of an advanced undergraduate abstract algebra course conducted by Prof. Ming-Lun Hsieh in National Taiwan University.

An application of topological groups is the study of Galois theory for infinite extensions.

Let E/kE/k be a Galois extension (in general), for which its degree of extension, [E:k][E : k], may be infinite.

It follows that its Galois group, denoted as Gal(E/k)\mathrm{Gal}(E/k), which is defined by the set of automorphisms of E/kE/k, denoted as Autk(E)\mathrm{Aut}_k(E) here, has infinite order.

Thanks to the fundamental theorem of Galois theory, if a Galois extension is finite, then there exists a one-to-one correspondence, which is also named Galois correspondence, between its intermediate field extensions and the subgroups of its Galois group, described as follows.

{K:intermediate extensions in E/K/k}{H: subgroups of Gal(E/k)}KGal(E/K)EHH\begin{gather*} \{ K : \text{intermediate extensions in } E/K/k \} & \to & \{ H : \text{ subgroups of } \mathrm{Gal}(E/k) \} \\ K & \mapsto & \mathrm{Gal}(E/K) \\ E^H & \leftarrowtail & H \end{gather*}

Here, EH:={xE:σ(x)=x for all σH} E^H := \{ x \in E : \sigma(x)=x \text{ for all } \sigma \in H \} represents the HH-invariant of EE (note that HH here denotes a subgroup of Gal(E/k)\mathrm{Gal}(E/k)).

Note that under this correspondence, the field EE itself necessarily corresponds to the trivial group {e}\{e\}, whereas kk corresponds to the whole group Gal(E/k)\mathrm{Gal}(E/k) itself.

However, if the extension is finite, i.e. Gal(E/k)\mathrm{Gal}(E/k) becomes an infinite group, then in general this one-to-one correspondence may cease to exist. Still, not all hope is lost. We can still obtain a one-to-one correspondence when we restrict the condition of the subgroups a bit to be closed subgroups, but "closed" in what sense? This is where topology comes into play.

Krull Topology: A Topology on Galois Groups

Let E/kE/k be a Galois extension. To understand what is going on with "closed subgroups" just now, we will define a topology on G=Gal(E/k)G=\mathrm{Gal}(E/k) such that the open neighbourhood of the identity element eGe \in G constains Gal(E/F)\mathrm{Gal}(E/F) where F/kF/k is a finite extension.

Definition (Krull topology). A subset of UU of GG is open, i.e. UU is in the Krull topology, if for all σU\sigma \in U, there exists a finite extension F/kF/k such that σGal(E/F)\sigma \cdot \mathrm{Gal}(E/F) U \subset U .

Here, F/kF/k is regarded as a "distance" and Gal(E/F)\mathrm{Gal}(E/F) is regarded as a "distance-neighbourhood" in the sense that such "distance" is zero if and only if there is no intermediate fields between FF and EE.

Under this topology, we can then say that a subgroup HH of GG is open (resp. closed) if HH is open (resp. closed, i.e. G\HG \backslash H is open).

Just like any other topological space, it is possible here for a subgroup to be both closed and open. A notable example is Gal(E/F)G\mathrm{Gal}(E/F) \subset G, where F/kF/k is a finite extension.

Why is Gal(E/F)\mathrm{Gal}(E/F) both open and closed?

Let H=Gal(E/F)H = \mathrm{Gal}(E/F). Since FF is a finite field extension of kk, it follows that [G:H][G : H] is finite and [G:H]=[F:k][G : H] = [F : k], so GG is equal to a finite disjoint union of its (left) cosets, i.e. G=i=1nxiHG = \bigsqcup_{i=1}^{n} x_i H for some xi,,xnGx_i, \ldots, x_n \in G, so H=G\i=1nxiHH = G \backslash \bigsqcup_{i=1}^{n} x_i H is closed, since xiHx_i H is open for each i=1,,ni = 1,\ldots,n (why?).

Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory for Infinite Extensions

Theorem. Let E/kE/k be an infinite Galois extension, then there is a one-to-one correspondence as follows:

{K:intermediate extensions in E/K/k}{H: closed subgroups of Gal(E/k)}KGal(E/K)EHH\begin{gather*} \{ K : \text{intermediate extensions in } E/K/k \} & \to & \{ H : \text{ \textbf{closed} subgroups of } \mathrm{Gal}(E/k) \} \\ K & \mapsto & \mathrm{Gal}(E/K) \\ E^H & \leftarrowtail & H \end{gather*}

Proof. Here, we denote E/K/kE/K/k as a tower of field extensions.

Let K=iKiK = \bigcup_i{K_i}, where KiK_i are finite extensions of kk, then Gal(E/K)=iIGal(E/Ki)\mathrm{Gal}(E/K)=\bigcap_{i \in I} \mathrm{Gal}(E/K_i).

Note that Gal(E/Ki)\mathrm{Gal}(E/K_i) are closed and open, as previously proven, thus Gal(E/K)\mathrm{Gal}(E/K) is closed.

Let H=Gal(E/K)H = \mathrm{Gal}(E/K). We want to show that K=EHK = E^H. By definition, KEHK \subset E^H. If KEHK \neq E^H, then there exists αEH\K\alpha \in E^H \backslash K and there exists σGal(E/K)\sigma \in \mathrm{Gal}(E/K) such that σ(α)α\sigma(\alpha) \neq \alpha. Since the set of homomorphisms Homk(E, \mathrm{Hom}_{k}(E, k\overline{k} )) can be mapped surjectively to Homk(k(α),k)\mathrm{Hom}_k(k(\alpha),\overline{k}), we then have σH\sigma \in H but σ(α)α\sigma(\alpha) \neq \alpha, which leads to a contradiction.

Conversely, let HH be a closed subgroup of GG and K=EHK=E^H. We want to show that HGal(E/K)H \simeq \mathrm{Gal}(E/K). By definition, HGal(E/K)H \subset \mathrm{Gal}(E/K). Suppose that HGal(E/K)H \subsetneq \mathrm{Gal}(E/K), then there exists σGal(E/k)\sigma \in \mathrm{Gal}(E/k) such that σH\sigma \notin H. Since HH is closed in GG, there exists a finite extension F/kF/k such that σGal(E/F)H=\sigma \cdot \mathrm{Gal}(E/F) \cap H = \emptyset.

By extending FF where required, we can assume that F/kF/k is Galois. Note that σGal(E/F)H=\sigma \cdot \mathrm{Gal}(E/F) \cap H = \emptyset if and only if σ\sigma \notin HGal(E/F)H \cdot \mathrm{Gal}(E/F), if and only if σF\sigma|_F HF\notin H|_F. Here, HFH|_F represents the image of HH in Gal(F/k)\mathrm{Gal}(F/k), i.e. Im  H={τFGal(F/k):τH}\mathrm{Im}\; H = \{\tau|_F \in \mathrm{Gal}(F/k) : \tau \in H \}.

Since σFIm  H\sigma|_F \notin \mathrm{Im}\; H, there exists some αFH\alpha \in F^H such that σ(α)α\sigma(\alpha) \neq \alpha by Galois Theory for Finite Extensions, but αFH=FEHK\alpha \in F^H = F \cap E^H \subset K, a contradiction.

Further reading

Topological Transcendental Fields

https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1680/11/3/118