Extras
Topological Groups (Munkres Chapter 2, Supplementary Exercises Section)
The crossover between the studies of topology and abstract algebra gives rise to the concept of topological groups.
Definition. A topological group is a group that is also a topological space satisfying the axiom, such that the binary operation map given by and inverse map given by are continuous maps.
- Let denote a group that is also a topological space satisfying the axiom. Show that is a topological group if and only if the map of into sending into is continuous.
- Show that the following are topological groups:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d) , where we take to be the space of all complex numbers for which .
(e) The general linear group , under the operation of matrix multiplication. ( is the set of all nonsingular matrices, topologised by considering it as a subset of Euclidean space of dimension in the natural way.)
- Let be a subspace of . Show that if is also a subgroup of , then both and are topological groups.
- The integer are a normal subgroup of . The quotient is a familiar topological group; what is it?
Galois Theory for Infinite Extensions
This section is based on a lecture of an advanced undergraduate abstract algebra course conducted by Prof. Ming-Lun Hsieh in National Taiwan University.
An application of topological groups is the study of Galois theory for infinite extensions.
Let be a Galois extension (in general), for which its degree of extension, , may be infinite.
It follows that its Galois group, denoted as , which is defined by the set of automorphisms of , denoted as here, has infinite order.
Thanks to the fundamental theorem of Galois theory, if a Galois extension is finite, then there exists a one-to-one correspondence, which is also named Galois correspondence, between its intermediate field extensions and the subgroups of its Galois group, described as follows.
Here, represents the -invariant of (note that here denotes a subgroup of ).
Note that under this correspondence, the field itself necessarily corresponds to the trivial group , whereas corresponds to the whole group itself.
However, if the extension is finite, i.e. becomes an infinite group, then in general this one-to-one correspondence may cease to exist. Still, not all hope is lost. We can still obtain a one-to-one correspondence when we restrict the condition of the subgroups a bit to be closed subgroups, but "closed" in what sense? This is where topology comes into play.
Krull Topology: A Topology on Galois Groups
Let be a Galois extension. To understand what is going on with "closed subgroups" just now, we will define a topology on such that the open neighbourhood of the identity element constains where is a finite extension.
Definition (Krull topology). A subset of of is open, i.e. is in the Krull topology, if for all , there exists a finite extension such that .
Here, is regarded as a "distance" and is regarded as a "distance-neighbourhood" in the sense that such "distance" is zero if and only if there is no intermediate fields between and .
Under this topology, we can then say that a subgroup of is open (resp. closed) if is open (resp. closed, i.e. is open).
Just like any other topological space, it is possible here for a subgroup to be both closed and open. A notable example is , where is a finite extension.
Why is both open and closed?
Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory for Infinite Extensions
Theorem. Let be an infinite Galois extension, then there is a one-to-one correspondence as follows:
Proof. Here, we denote as a tower of field extensions.
Let , where are finite extensions of , then .
Note that are closed and open, as previously proven, thus is closed.
Let . We want to show that . By definition, . If , then there exists and there exists such that . Since the set of homomorphisms can be mapped surjectively to , we then have but , which leads to a contradiction.
Conversely, let be a closed subgroup of and . We want to show that . By definition, . Suppose that , then there exists such that . Since is closed in , there exists a finite extension such that .
By extending where required, we can assume that is Galois. Note that if and only if , if and only if . Here, represents the image of in , i.e. .
Since , there exists some such that by Galois Theory for Finite Extensions, but , a contradiction.
Further reading
- Marks, S. (2020). Galois representations. (A note on the Tutorial on modular forms course conducted in 2020)