MA3209 Past Final Papers Attempts
MA3209 Metric and Topological Spaces is a mathematics course offered in the National University of Singapore (NUS) that revolves around general topology, with a focus on metric spaces.
This page presents my own attempt on (a) past-year final exam paper(s) of this course.
Academic Year 2023/2024 Semester 2
-
Indicate if the following statements are true or false.
(a) If is continuous and is connected, then is connected.
(b) The metric completion of a topological space is compact.
(c) If is a normal topological space and is a closed subspace, then is normal.
(d) Every metric space is second countable.
(e) Let be a set and equip with the standard metric. The set of bounded functions on , when equipped with the supremum metric, is complete.
Indicate if the following statements are true or false.
(a) If is continuous and is connected, then is connected.
(b) The metric completion of a topological space is compact.
(c) If is a normal topological space and is a closed subspace, then is normal.
(d) Every metric space is second countable.
(e) Let be a set and equip with the standard metric. The set of bounded functions on , when equipped with the supremum metric, is complete.
(a) True. See Theorem 23.5 in Chapter 3 of Munkres.
(b) False. The set of real numbers is a metric completion of the set of rational numbers under the standard metric, but is not compact.
(c) True. See Exercise 32.1 in Chapter 4.
(d) False. the collection of sequences of real numbers in the uniform topology is not second-countable.
(e) True. See Theorem 43.6 in Chapter 7. Note that with the standard metric is complete and the uniform metric is equivalent to the supremum metric in .
-
Equip with the discrete topology, and equip with the induced product topology. Let be the subset defined by
(a) Show that is sequentially compact.
(b) Show that is not compact.
Equip with the discrete topology, and equip with the induced product topology. Let be the subset defined by
(a) Show that is sequentially compact.
(b) Show that is not compact.
(a) Note that is finite and thus compact. It is also metrizable since it is equipped with the discrete topology.
Let , then is countable since it is a countable union of countable sets. Since arbitrary products of compact spaces are compact and countable products of metrizable spaces are metrizable, it follows (by Theorem 28.2) that is sequentially compact.
Let be a sequence in . Define a projection map by , i.e. obtaining an element in by only taking coordinates of that are indexed by elements in . It follows that there is a subsequence that converges to, say, .
By filling in the coordinates indexed by elements in with zeroes, we obtain a subsequence of that converges to , and hence is sequentially compact.
(b) For each , define . It follows that is an open cover with no finite subcover, and thus is not compact.
To see this, note that each is open because it is generated by , where is open in , except for finitely many values of , and every subset of is open. also covers because each is a subset of and ranges over all real number indices. also has no finite subcover because for every element in , there are at least uncountable zeroes as its entries.
-
Let be a topological space.
(a) Show that if is locally path connected, then the quotient topology on the set of connected components of is discrete.
(b) Find an example of a space where the quotient topology on the set of connected components of is not discrete.
Let be a topological space.
(a) Show that if is locally path connected, then the quotient topology on the set of connected components of is discrete.
(b) Find an example of a space where the quotient topology on the set of connected components of is not discrete.
(a) Since is locally path connected, the connected components and path components of are the same1. For every open set of , in particular itself, each path (connected) component of is open in 2. By definition, the quotient topology on the set of connected components of (which we denote here by ) is induced by a surjective map that is a quotient map, and is defined by the subsets of such that is open in . It follows that every subset of can be expressed as , where each is a connected component of , which implies that is open in and thus is open in . Since we know that every connected component of is open, the resulting topology is discrete.
(b) Let be the 'topologist's sine curve' defined as follows:
It follows that the quotient topology on the set of connected components of is homeomorphic to the Sierpinski space with the topology , which is not discrete.
-
(a) Show that if is a compact, Hausdorff topological space that contains more than one point, then there is a non-constant continuous function .
(b) Let be a compact metric space, let and let denote the set of functions such that for all . Show that is compact in the topology of pointwise convergence.
(c) Show that if is a locally compact, Hausdorff, -compact, second-countable topological space, then is completely metrizable.
(a) Show that if is a compact, Hausdorff topological space that contains more than one point, then there is a non-constant continuous function .
(b) Let be a compact metric space, let and let denote the set of functions such that for all . Show that is compact in the topology of pointwise convergence.
(c) Show that if is a locally compact, Hausdorff, -compact, second-countable topological space, then is completely metrizable.
(a) Let be a compact, Hausdorff topological space that contains more than one point. Since is compact and Hausdorff, is normal3. Thus, if we denote two disjoint closed subsets of by and (which is possible since has more than one point), by the Urysohn lemma, there exists a continuous map where for every and for every . By 'embedding' the function into , we obtain a non-constant, continuous function as desired.
(b) Note that the topology of pointwise convergence is equivalent to the product topology. Let be arbitrarily chosen and fixed. We can then view as a subset of such that each of its factors is bounded by a constant in a weak inequality for each . This implies that is closed and bounded, and thus compact. By Tychonoff theorem, it follows that is compact in the topology of pointwise convergence.
(c) In fact, if a space is locally compact and second-countable, it is -compact4.
Since every locally compact, Hausdorff space is regular5, combined with Urysohn metrization theorem, is metrizable. Let be the completion of 6. We claim that is open in and thus completely metrizable4. To see this, let be an isometric embedding. Let and be a neighbourhood of that is contained in a compact subspace of . It follows that is a compact (also equivalently, sequentially compact) subset of so it cannot contain any element . By the same argument, , so and , which implies that for every in , there exists a neighbourhood of with respect to that is contained in , so is open in .
-
Let be a metric space, and let be a sequence of continuous maps from to . Denote .
(a) Show that the compact-open topology on the space is Hausdorff.
(b) Show that if converges pointwise to map and is an equicontinuous family, then is continuous.
(c) Show that if converges in the compact open topology to a continuous map , then is an equicontinuous family.
Let be a metric space, and let be a sequence of continuous maps from to . Denote .
(a) Show that the compact-open topology on the space is Hausdorff.
(b) Show that if converges pointwise to map and is an equicontinuous family, then is continuous.
(c) Show that if converges in the compact open topology to a continuous map , then is an equicontinuous family.
(a) We want to prove that if and are topological spaces, then in the compact-open topology, is Hausdorff if is Hausdorff.7
Recall the definition of a subbasis element of a compact-open topology: if and are topological spaces, is a compact subspace of and is an open subset of , then a subbasis element of the compact-open topology is defined as follows:
Let be two distinct elements in , then there exists an element such that . Since is Hausdorff, we obtain a neighbourhood of and of such that . Pick ; it is compact since it is finite. It follows by the definition of the subbasis element above that and are disjoint neighbourhoods of and respectively. Thus, the compact-open topology is Hausdorff.
Finally, since is a metric space, is also Hausdorff, thus from the result above the compact-open topology on is Hausdorff, as desired.
(b) Let be a sequence of continuous maps from to that converges pointwise to a function . Note that is metrizable, so we can use the sequential criterion of continuity to prove the continuity of .
Let be arbitrary. Let be a sequence in that converges to a point , then for each neighbourhood of , there exists a positive integer such that whenever .
Let be a sequence in . Due to the pointwise convergence of to , there exist positive integers for each , as well as a positive integer , such that and whenever and respectively. Due to the equicontinuity of , in particular at the limit point of the sequence , there exists a neighbourhood of such that for all and , we have .
Now, choose a positive integer such that is larger than , and a positive integer such that is larger than and for each (not all, each) . It follows by triangle inequality that whenever and , we have that
This implies that the sequence converges to , so is continuous.
(c) Suppose that converges in the compact open topology to a continuous map . Note that since is a metric space, the compact open topology is equal to the topology of compact convergence8. This implies that for each compact subspace of , the sequence converges uniformly to 9.
Let be arbitrary. Let . Utilising its local compactness, let be a neighbourhood of that is contained in some compact subspace . Due to the aforementioned uniform convergence, there exists a positive integer such that for each , we have that . Due to the continuity of the limit function , there exists a neighbourhood of such that for each , we have that .
Applying triangle inequality, it follows that whenever (which is also a neighbourhood of that is contained in ) and , we have that
As for the terms in the sequence where , utilising the continuity of each , choose a neighbourhood of such that for each . It follows that for the neighbourhood of , we have for all .
Combining the two cases together, we obtain a neighbourhood of , specifically , such that for all points in the neighbourhood and all . Therefore, is equicontinuous.
Footnotes
-
This is possible due to Theorem 43.7 in Chapter 7 of Munkres. ↩
-
See also Exercise 46.6 in Chapter 7 of Munkres. ↩